lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] mtd: nand: pxa3xx-nand: fix random command timeouts
From
On 19 August 2015 at 15:30, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> wrote:
> When 2 commands are submitted in a row, and the second is very quick,
> the completion of the second command might never come. This happens
> especially if the second command is quick, such as a status read after
> an erase.
>
> The issue is that in the interrupt handler, the status bits are cleared
> after the new command is issued. There is a small temporal window where
> this happens :
> - the previous command has set the command done bit
> - the ready for a command bit is set
> - the handler submits the next command
> - just then, the command completes, and the command done bit is still
> set
> - the handler clears the "previous" command done bit
> - the handler exits
>
> In this flow, the "command done" of the next command will never trigger
> a new interrupt to finish the status command, as it was cleared for both
> commands.
>
> Fix this by clearing the status bit before submitting a new command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> index d1a4c336de1d..d6c696798811 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> @@ -675,8 +675,14 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid)
> is_ready = 1;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Clear all status bit before issuing the next command, which
> + * can and will alter the status bits and will deserve a new
> + * interrupt on its own. This lets the controller exit the IRQ
> + */
> + nand_writel(info, NDSR, status);
> +

Actually, the comment I had in mind was more about why
we *cannot* clear the NDSR register before waking the
IRQ thread.

But this is a nitpick: I don't care much :-)

> if (status & NDSR_WRCMDREQ) {
> - nand_writel(info, NDSR, NDSR_WRCMDREQ);
> status &= ~NDSR_WRCMDREQ;
> info->state = STATE_CMD_HANDLE;
>
> @@ -697,8 +703,6 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid)
> nand_writel(info, NDCB0, info->ndcb3);
> }
>
> - /* clear NDSR to let the controller exit the IRQ */
> - nand_writel(info, NDSR, status);
> if (is_completed)
> complete(&info->cmd_complete);
> if (is_ready)
> --
> 2.1.4
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/



--
Ezequiel García, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-08-20 02:41    [W:0.061 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site