Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message body | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Date | Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:27:38 +0200 |
| |
> Note also that some maintainers have work flow that deliberately smash > the date (i.e., because they are using a system such as guilt), > so if you are depending on the submitted timestamp, it's going to > break on you.
Thanks for your hint.
I am just trying to offer the possibility for the reuse of a more precise commit timestamp together with an appropriate author mail address for my update suggestions. Do you reject any more such message field overrides?
Regards, Markus
| |