lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] suspend: delete sys_sync()
    Hi!

    > > Moreover, question is if we really need to carry out the sync on *every*
    > > suspend even if it is not pointless overall. That shouldn't really be
    > > necessary if we suspend and resume often enough or if we resume only for
    > > a while and then suspend again. Maybe it should be rate limited somehow
    > > at least?
    >
    > If you suspend and resume frequently, then the cost of the sync
    > shoul dbe negliable because the amount of data dirtied between
    > resume/suspend shoul dbe negliable. hence my questions about where
    > sync is spending too much time, and whether we've actually fixed
    > those problems or not. If sync speed on clean filesystems is a
    > problem then we need to fix sync, not work around it.

    And yes, that's solution I'd really prefer over adding knobs to
    suspend.
    Pavel
    --
    (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
    (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-07-06 13:41    [W:2.110 / U:0.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site