lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched,kvm: Fix KVM preempt_notifier usage
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 05:38:42PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> So basically this. Can you reply with SoB and maybe Acked-by?

Ah, thanks for doing that!

> ------------- 8< ---------------
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] sched, preempt_notifier: separate notifier registration from static_key inc/dec
>
> Commit 1cde2930e154 ("sched/preempt: Add static_key() to preempt_notifiers")
> had two problems. First, the preempt-notifier API needs to sleep with the
> addition of the static_key, we do however need to hold off preemption
> while modifying the preempt notifier list, otherwise a preemption could
> observe an inconsistent list state. KVM correctly registers and
> unregisters preempt notifiers with preemption disabled, so the sleep
> caused dmesg splats.
>
> Second, KVM registers and unregisters preemption notifiers very often
> (in vcpu_load/vcpu_put). With a single uniprocessor guest the static key
> would move between 0 and 1 continuously, hitting the slow path on every
> userspace exit.
>
> To fix this, wrap the static_key inc/dec in a new API, and call it from
> KVM.
>
> Fixes: 1cde2930e154 ("sched/preempt: Add static_key() to preempt_notifiers")
> Reported-by: Pontus Fuchs <pontus.fuchs@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-03 18:01    [W:0.053 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site