lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
Hello Stephen,

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:00:15PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> -359 i386 userfaultfd sys_userfaultfd
> ++374 i386 userfaultfd sys_userfaultfd

Do I understand correctly the syscall number of userfaultfd for x86
32bit has just changed from 359 to 374? Appreciated that you CCed me
on such a relevant change to be sure I didn't miss it.

Then the below is needed as well.

One related question: is it ok to ship kernels in production right now
with the userfaultfd syscall number 374 for x86 32bit ABI (after the
above change) and 323 for x86-64 64bit ABI, with these syscalls number
registered in linux-next or it may keep changing like it has just
happened? I refer only to userfaultfd syscalls of x86 32bit and x86-64
64bit, not all other syscalls in linux-next.

Of course, I know full well that the standard answer is no, and in
fact the above is an expected and fine change. In other words what I'm
really asking is if I wonder if I could get an agreement here that
from now on, the syscall number of userfaultfd for x86 32bit and
x86-64 64bit won't change anymore in linux-next and it's already
reserved just like if it was already upstream.

Again: I'd only seek such guarantee for the x86-64 64bit and x86 32bit
ABIs (not any other arch, and not any other syscall). If I could get
such a guarantee from you within the next week or two, that would
avoid me complications and some work, so I thought it was worth
asking. If it's not possible never mind.

Thanks,
Andrea

===
From 873093c32b4b1d0b6c3f18ec1e52b56c24f67457 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:53:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] userfaultfd: selftest: update userfaultfd x86 32bit syscall
number

It changed as result of linux-next merge of other syscalls.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index 0c0b839..76071b1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
#ifdef __x86_64__
#define __NR_userfaultfd 323
#elif defined(__i386__)
-#define __NR_userfaultfd 359
+#define __NR_userfaultfd 374
#elif defined(__powewrpc__)
#define __NR_userfaultfd 364
#else

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-29 21:12    [W:0.682 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site