[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] time: Add the common weak version of update_persistent_clock()
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Xunlei Pang wrote:

> From: Xunlei Pang <>
> The weak update_persistent_clock64() calls update_persistent_clock(),
> if the architecture defines a update_persistent_clock64() to replace
> and remove its update_persistent_clock() version, the compiler will

s/compiler/linker/ right?

> throw an undefined symbol error, that is, any arch that switches to
> update_persistent_clock64() will have this issue.
> So, we should add the common weak update_persistent_clock().

Are we adding it or should we add it?



 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-26 11:01    [W:0.028 / U:1.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site