Messages in this thread | | | From | Chao Yu <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: reorganize __f2fs_add_link | Date | Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:31:16 +0800 |
| |
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 2:15 AM > To: Chao Yu > Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: reorganize __f2fs_add_link > > Hi Chao, > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 06:21:52PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > > Firstly, spliting init_inode_metadata into two parts as below since they > > are relatively independent. > > 1) init_inode_metadata: init datas belong to newly created inode; > > 2) update_inode_metadata: update inode info for linking inode to new > > dentry. > > > > Secondly, move init_inode_metadata to the front of __f2fs_add_link, > > So the flow of __f2fs_add_link will be reorganized as: > > 1) init inode meta data for new creatation; > > 2) lookup dentry page and insert new directory entry in the page; > > 3) update meta data of inode and parent. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com> > > --- > > fs/f2fs/dir.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 +- > > fs/f2fs/inline.c | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c > > index a34ebd8..0ad9a1c 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c > > @@ -381,43 +381,68 @@ static int make_empty_dir(struct inode *inode, > > return 0; > > } > > > > -struct page *init_inode_metadata(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, > > +int init_inode_metadata(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, > > const struct qstr *name, struct page *dpage) > > { > > struct page *page; > > int err; > > > > - if (is_inode_flag_set(F2FS_I(inode), FI_NEW_INODE)) { > > - page = new_inode_page(inode); > > - if (IS_ERR(page)) > > - return page; > > + if (!is_inode_flag_set(F2FS_I(inode), FI_NEW_INODE)) > > + return 0; > > > > - if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { > > - err = make_empty_dir(inode, dir, page); > > - if (err) > > - goto error; > > - } > > + page = new_inode_page(inode); > > + if (IS_ERR(page)) > > + return PTR_ERR(page); > > > > - err = f2fs_init_acl(inode, dir, page, dpage); > > + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { > > + err = make_empty_dir(inode, dir, page); > > if (err) > > - goto put_error; > > + goto error; > > + } > > > > - err = f2fs_init_security(inode, dir, name, page); > > + err = f2fs_init_acl(inode, dir, page, dpage); > > + if (err) > > + goto put_error; > > + > > + err = f2fs_init_security(inode, dir, name, page); > > + if (err) > > + goto put_error; > > + > > + if (f2fs_encrypted_inode(dir) && f2fs_may_encrypt(inode)) { > > + err = f2fs_inherit_context(dir, inode, page); > > if (err) > > goto put_error; > > + } > > > > - if (f2fs_encrypted_inode(dir) && f2fs_may_encrypt(inode)) { > > - err = f2fs_inherit_context(dir, inode, page); > > - if (err) > > - goto put_error; > > - } > > - } else { > > - page = get_node_page(F2FS_I_SB(dir), inode->i_ino); > > - if (IS_ERR(page)) > > - return page; > > + if (f2fs_encrypted_inode(dir)) > > + file_set_enc_name(inode); > > + > > + update_inode(inode, page); > > + f2fs_put_page(page, 1); > > We should not put the inode page here. > Since checkpoint can be called and flush all the node pages with valid > NAT entres. Once power-off happens after then, we can see unreachable NAT > entries.
IMO, all callers of init_inode_metadata such as __f2fs_add_link/f2fs_do_tmpfile, they are all protected well by cp_rwsem, so checkpoint & SPO will not easily bother us.
1) Lately in __f2fs_add_link, ino of ipage will be inserted into directory entry of parent's inode, this makes our nat entry of ipage reachable. 2) And also in __f2fs_tmpfile, ino will be added in orphan list, so all data resource of the inode will be evicted after CP->SPO->RFR procedure.
Is there anything I missed?
Thanks,
> > Thanks,
| |