lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [GIT PULL] ARM: EXYNOS: mach: Improvements for 4.3
Date
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> On 21.07.2015 14:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 2015-07-21 14:13 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>:
> >> 2015-07-21 14:02 GMT+09:00 Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>:
> >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

[...]

> >>>> --
> >>>
> >>> Applied above changes into fixes/non-critical, next/cleanup-samsung,
> >>> next/dt-samsung and next/cpufreq-clk-samsung according to the change.
> >
> > Cc-ed Bartlomiej,
> >
> > One issue found: splitting DTS change for Exynos 5250 cpufreq to
> > separate branch will break bisectability. The commit "ARM: dts:
> > Exynos5250: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property":
> > 1. MUST be put after "clk: samsung: exynos5250: add cpu clock
> > configuration data and instantiate cpu clock" to prevent build
> > failures,
> > 2. should be put before "ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq
> > driver for Exynos5250" to prevent lost cpufreq functionality.
> >
> > Doing otherwise would lose bisectability which is really unfortunate
> > when you can simply avoid it. This should remain in the same branch -
> > next/cpufreq-clk-samsung.
>
> Dear Kukjin,
>
> Nothing changed since yesterday... so let me point this in a more clear
> way. The way you divided the patchset causes build errors:
>
> --------------
> HEAD is now at 565872a601c4... ARM: dts: add CPU OPP and regulator
> supply property for exynos5250
>
> ERROR: Failed build: -A arm -c exynos on
> 565872a601c4d91a75b917b1fb40ff27ad7ebb08
>
> LOGS:
> Error: ../arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi:65.21-22 syntax error
> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
> make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dtb] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [dtbs] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> --------------
>
> This breaks bisectability without any special valid reason.
>
Hi,

I couldn't check e-mail yesterday because of annual health check.
Anyway, I'll look at the error and handle it soon.

Thanks for your check.
Kukjin



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-23 10:21    [W:0.085 / U:0.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site