lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] lightweight per-cpu locks / restartable sequences
From
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> wrote:

>
> We've started experimenting with these to cut overheads in a few
> critical places, and while we don't have numbers yet I really hope it
> won't take too long.
>
> I think the topic is really interesting and we'll be able to get numbers
> from production workloads to help justify and compare different
> approaches.
>

I was interested by the idea since Paul(paulmck) and Mathieu introduced
it to me at the K.S. 2013. I didn't expect it is re-posted on LKML so late.
IMHO, the direction is useful and helpful not just only fun, I hope we can make
some progress on it.

Thanks
Lai

> -chris
> _______________________________________________
> Ksummit-discuss mailing list
> Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-22 16:21    [W:0.066 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site