lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3] x86/mm/pat: Do a small optimization and fix in reserve_memtype
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:06:04PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> how about:
> memtype_lock protects the rb-tree root and the rb-nodes which is a field of memtype from delete/add/lookup in a race.

Use this:

"All pat_rbtree operations need to be performed while holding the
memtype_lock."

> Actually I have same questions. I find these output logs are added in
> commit: 6997ab4982a29925e79f72c3a59823cf944c3529(x86: add PAT related
> debug prints) In the past, *new_type == actual_type == new->type on
> success. codes are below. author use actual_type there.

So this function is one bit PITA. So req_type is used to compute actual
type a bit higher:

actual_type = pat_x_mtrr_type(start, end, req_type);

and from then on actual_type is being used.

BUT!, in order to have *all* debugging information, the last dprintk()
call should dump actual_type and req_type because this way we show what
pat_x_mtrr_type() did too. And we don't need to dump new->type because
this is the !err case and in that case we assigned new_type to it, which
we dump already.

Ok?

Btw, you could also simplify this:

if (is_range_ram == 1) {

err = reserve_ram_pages_type(start, end, req_type, new_type);

return err;
}

to:

if (is_range_ram == 1)
return reserve_ram_pages_type(start, end, req_type, new_type);

while at it.

Thanks.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-22 13:01    [W:0.072 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site