lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/2] mfd: devicetree: add bindings for Atmel Flexcom
Hi Lee,

Le 21/07/2015 11:09, Lee Jones a écrit :
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
...
>> +- atmel,flexcom-mode: shall be a string among { "spi", "usart", "i2c", "twi" }.
>> + "i2c" and "twi" are synonymous.
>
> Please use a numerical value instead. You can then define it in
> include/dt-bindings/*
>
> This is only required if you supply more than one child node. Is that
> the plan? I ask because you only have one child node in the example
> below.
>
The "atmel,flexcom-mode" property is always required. The reset value of the
Operating Mode bit field inside the Flexcom Mode Register is 0 for "no serial
device". So none of the 3 embedded serial devices is clocked and all of their
registers are inaccessible (read as zero).
Before using any of the 3 serial devices, the Operating Mode must be set
accordingly by updating the Mode Register. Once done, only the selected serial
device is clocked. Also the external I/O lines of the Flexcom are muxed to
reach the selected serial device.

The muxing is given by the following table:

Flexcom pin USART pin SPI pin I2C pin
IO0 TXD MOSI TWD
IO1 RXD MISO TWCK
IO2 SCK SPCK -
IO3 CTS NPCS0 -
IO4 RTS NPCS1 -


Bus conflicting configuration:
______________________________________
| Flexcom |
| _____ _____ _____ |
| | |__CLK__| SPI |__I/O__| | | ___________ ___________
| | | |_____| | | | | SPI Slave | | I2C Slave |
| | CLK | | I/O | | |___________| |___________|
|_| MUX | _____ | MUX |__|_________|________________|
| | |__CLK__| I2C |__I/O__| | | shared bus
| |_____| |_____| |_____| |
|______________________________________|


For instance, it is very unlikely to connect both I2C and SPI slaves to
the very same Flexcom because I/O lines are shared. The operating mode is
selected once for all during the boot and will never change during runtime.
That's why the Flexcom DT node should have exactly one child.

>> +Example:
>> +
>> +flx0: flexcom@f8034000 {
>
> What references this node? If nothing, then you can remove the label.
OK, I will remove the label in the next series.
>
>> + compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-flexcom";
>> + reg = <0xf8034000 0x200>;
>> + clocks = <&flx0_clk>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> + ranges = <0x0 0xf8034000 0x800>;
>> + atmel,flexcom-mode = "spi";
>> +
>> + spi@f8034400 {
>> + compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-spi";
>> + reg = <0x400 0x200>;
>> + interrupts = <19 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flx0_ioset1>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + clocks = <&flx0_clk>;
>> + clock-names = "spi_clk";
>> + atmel,fifo-size = <32>;
>> +
>> + mtd_dataflash@0 {
>> + compatible = "atmel,at25f512b";
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + spi-max-frequency = <20000000>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>

Thanks for your review :)

Best Regards,

Cyrille


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-21 16:41    [W:0.087 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site