lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] bonding: "primary_reselect" with "failure" is not working properly
From
Date
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 15:43 +0530, Mazhar Rana wrote:
> When "primary_reselect" is set to "failure", primary interface should
> not become active until current active slave is up. But if we set first
> member of bond device as a "primary" interface and "primary_reselect"
> is set to "failure" then whenever primary interface's link get back(up)
> it become active slave even if current active slave is still up.
>
> With this patch, "bond_find_best_slave" will not traverse members if
> primary interface is not candidate for failover/reselection and current
> active slave is still up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mazhar Rana <mazhar.rana@cyberoam.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sanket Shah <sanket.shah@cyberoam.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 19eb990..ac71261 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static bool bond_should_change_active(struct bonding *bond)
> */
> static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> - struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary;
> + struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary, *curr;
> struct list_head *iter;
> int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
>
> @@ -724,6 +724,14 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> bond_should_change_active(bond))
> return primary;
>
> + /* We are here means primary interface is not candidate for
> + * reslection/failover. If currenet active slave is still up
> + * then there is no meaning to traverse members.
> + */
> + curr = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);

Here you carefully use rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave)

(This is good)

> + if (curr && curr->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
> + return bond->curr_active_slave;

But here you return bond->curr_active_slave
instead of curr

> +
> bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
> if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
> return slave;




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-02 13:41    [W:0.052 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site