lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] sched: modify how to compute a slice and check a preemptability
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 01:15:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 06:11:00PM +0900, byungchul.park@lge.com wrote:
> > doesn't it make sense?
>
> No, people have already given you all kinds of reasons why this isn't a

i feel sorry. but all kinds?. i got only a reason, that is, latency problem.
so i already mentioned both of two cases, because of the reason people told
me. furthermore, nobody gave me a reason why the code should use local cfs's
nr_running to get period at all.

> good change. It is also a very invasive change and you have no
> performance numbers one way or another.
>
> I'm going to fully ignore this thread from now on.

sorry for bothering you.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-20 02:21    [W:0.067 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site