lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Enable minimalistic support for Thunder
Date
the discussion on the generic cpu seems to be stuck, is there a possibility to take this patch. so that Thunder has a chance to run some KVM.

Thanks,
Tirumalesh.
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 29/06/15 18:06, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
>>>> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
>>>> minimal support required.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>
>>>
>>> CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the first course of action.
>>>
>> thanks.
>>
>>> Also, you may want to try Suzuki's patch instead:
>>>
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg117703.html
>>>
>> will try with this.
>>
>>> Constantly adding new CPUs without providing any insight as to how they
>>> should be emulated only brings churn, and not much benefit.
>>>
>> we are not planning(at this point) to emulate Thunder with QEMU/others.
>
> Fair enough. If cross-cpu VM migration is none of your concern, then
> Suzuki's patch should be enough.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-16 20:01    [W:0.087 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site