Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Frederic Weisbecker <> | Subject | [PATCH 2/4] apm32: Fix cputime == jiffies assumption | Date | Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:37:51 +0200 |
| |
That code wrongly assumes that cputime_t wraps jiffies_t. Lets use the correct accessors/mutators.
No real harm now as that code can't be used with full dynticks.
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc; John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c index 927ec92..052c9c3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ recalc: } else if (jiffies_since_last_check > idle_period) { unsigned int idle_percentage; - idle_percentage = stime - last_stime; + idle_percentage = cputime_to_jiffies(stime - last_stime); idle_percentage *= 100; idle_percentage /= jiffies_since_last_check; use_apm_idle = (idle_percentage > idle_threshold); -- 2.1.4
| |