lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: fix IMC missing box initialization

* Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> wrote:

> On Mon, 11 May 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:43:32AM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > This leads me to believe that this patch:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
> > > > > > Author: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
> > > > > > Date: Tue Jan 20 04:54:25 2015 +0000
> > > > > >
> > > > > > perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move uncore_box_init() out of driver
> > > > > initialization
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I revert it, I bet things will work again.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes the initialization needs to be moved out of the IPI context.
> > >
> > > I'm for the clean revert I think. Crashing is bad, but hiding/delaying
> > > it seems counter productive too, it'll just mean we'll only learn about
> > > it later.
> >
> > So should I revert c05199e5a57a, with a Cc: stable?
>
> any progress on this issue? With 4.1-rc7 I can still quickly crash a
> Haswell machine due to this bug.

This dropped through the cracks. Peter?

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-09 09:41    [W:0.055 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site