Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Jun 2015 12:54:26 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Fix sched_wakeup tracepoint |
| |
On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:46:46 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> to the time between wakeup and sched switch. > > My point exactly, wake->schedule is what we call the scheduling latency, > not the wake latency, which would be from 'event' to the task being > runnable.
Right, which means the tracepoint should be as close to the "wakeup_process()" or whatever calls try_to_wake_up().
Which would be the "sched_waking" part of your proposal.
-- Steve
| |