lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:11:34PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> We need different orderings when turning a core on and turning a core
> off. In one case we need to assert reset before turning power off.
> In ther other case we need to turn power on and the deassert reset.
>
> In general, the correct flow is:
>
> CPU off:
> reset_control_assert
> regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), BIT(pd))
> wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_off
> CPU on:
> regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), 0)
> wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_on
> reset_control_deassert
>
> This is needed for stressing CPU up/down, as per:
> cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/
> for i in $(seq 10000); do
> echo "================= $i ============"
> for j in $(seq 100); do
> while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "000"" ]]
> echo 0 > cpu1/online
> echo 0 > cpu2/online
> echo 0 > cpu3/online
> done
> while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "111" ]]; do
> echo 1 > cpu1/online
> echo 1 > cpu2/online
> echo 1 > cpu3/online
> done
> done
> done
>
> The following is reproducile log:

"reproducable"

> [34466.186812] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 0.669 msecs
> [34466.186824] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
> [34466.187509] CPU1: shutdown
> [34466.188672] CPU2: shutdown
> [34473.736627] Kernel panic - not syncing:Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0
> .......
> or others similar log:
> .......
> [ 4072.454453] CPU1: shutdown
> [ 4072.504436] CPU2: shutdown
> [ 4072.554426] CPU3: shutdown
> [ 4072.577827] CPU1: Booted secondary processor
> [ 4072.582611] CPU2: Booted secondary processor
> [ 4072.587426] CPU3: Booted secondary processor
> <hang>
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>
> Changes in v5:
> - back to v2 cpu on/off flow, As Heiko point out in patch v3.
> - delay more time in rockchip_boot_secondary().
> From CPU up/down tests, Needed more time to complete CPU process.
> In order to ensure a more, Here that be delayed 1ms.
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Add reset_control_put(rstc) for the non-error case.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - FIx the PATCH v2, it doesn't work on chromium 3.14.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - As Heiko suggestion, re-adjust the cpu on/off flow.
> CPU off:
> reset_control_assert
> regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), BIT(pd))
> wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_off
> CPU on:
> regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), 0)
> wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_on
> reset_control_deassert
>
> ---
>
> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> index 5b4ca3c..bd40852 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static struct reset_control *rockchip_get_core_reset(int cpu)
> static int pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on)
> {
> u32 val = (on) ? 0 : BIT(pd);
> + struct reset_control *rstc = rockchip_get_core_reset(pd);
> int ret;
>
> /*
> @@ -80,20 +81,15 @@ static int pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on)
> * processor is powered down.
> */
> if (read_cpuid_part() != ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
> - struct reset_control *rstc = rockchip_get_core_reset(pd);
> -
> + /* We only require the reset on the RK3288 at the moment */
> if (IS_ERR(rstc)) {
> pr_err("%s: could not get reset control for core %d\n",
> __func__, pd);
> return PTR_ERR(rstc);
> }
>
> - if (on)
> - reset_control_deassert(rstc);
> - else
> + if (!on)
> reset_control_assert(rstc);
> -
> - reset_control_put(rstc);
> }
>
> ret = regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), val);
> @@ -112,6 +108,12 @@ static int pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on)
> }
> }
>
> + if (read_cpuid_part() != ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9 && on)
> + reset_control_deassert(rstc);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(rstc))
> + reset_control_put(rstc);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -148,7 +150,7 @@ static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
> * sram_base_addr + 4: 0xdeadbeaf
> * sram_base_addr + 8: start address for pc
> * */
> - udelay(10);
> + mdelay(1);

The reason for this delay needs a comment, as it's not obvious why you
would need to delay before writing to the SRAM. Also documenting in
a comment why the delay is necessary would be good.

--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-08 11:41    [W:1.968 / U:23.644 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site