Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Wu, Feng" <> | Subject | RE: [v9 0/9] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support - IOMMU part | Date | Mon, 8 Jun 2015 01:23:17 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Joerg Roedel [mailto:joro@8bytes.org] > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 9:34 PM > To: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Wu, Feng; dwmw2@infradead.org; jiang.liu@linux.intel.com; > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [v9 0/9] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support - IOMMU part > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:47:06PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Feng Wu wrote: > > > Divide the whole series which contain multiple components into three > parts: > > > - Prerequisite changes to irq subsystem (already merged in tip tree x86/apic > branch) > > > - IOMMU part (in this series) > > > > Please add > > > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > > > > Which tree should this go through? It depends on tip/x86/apic AFAICT, > > so we can take it through that, if Joerg provides his ACK. > > Yeah, these changes depend on tip/x86/apic, so it doesn't make sense to > send them through the iommu tree. There will be some conflicts when > merging tip/x86/apic and the iommu tree together, though, mainly because > of the vt-d kdump fixing patches I have in my tree. The conflicts are > spread over 3 files, but not too serious and easy to resolve. > > Anyway, you have my > > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> > > for those. >
Hi Joerg,
Thanks for your ACK on this series!
Hi Thomas,
Thanks a lot for your review!
Do you need me to send another version which adds the reviewed-by and acked-by tags, or you can do it yourself on this version and merge it to tip/x86/apic?
Thanks, Feng
> > Joerg
|  |