lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm: perf: Set affinity for PPI based PMUs
Hi Stephen,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:58:46PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> For PPI based PMUs, we bail out early in of_pmu_irq_cfg() without
> setting the PMU's supported_cpus bitmap. This causes the
> smp_call_function_any() in armv7_probe_num_events() to fail. Set
> the bitmap to be all CPUs so that we properly probe PMUs that use
> PPIs.
>
> Fixes: cc88116da0d1 ("arm: perf: treat PMUs as CPU affine")
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 54272e0be713..7d5379c1c443 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -795,8 +795,10 @@ static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
>
> /* Don't bother with PPIs; they're already affine */
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq))
> + if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
> + cpumask_setall(&pmu->supported_cpus);
> return 0;
> + }

Looks good to me as a fix, but I'm currently working on extending the
interrupt-affinity property to work with both SPIs and PPIs so that we
can use it to identify PMU affinity on multi-cluster systems.

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/updates&id=633fa0b629d86e58d68aff295f92031877dd0294

Any chance you could take that for a spin on your platform, please?

Will


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-30 11:21    [W:0.035 / U:0.600 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site