Messages in this thread | | | From | Martin Steigerwald <> | Subject | Re: kdbus: to merge or not to merge? | Date | Wed, 24 Jun 2015 13:43:33 +0200 |
| |
Am Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2015, 10:05:02 schrieb Ingo Molnar: > Not because I like it so much, but because I think the merge process > should be stripped of politics and emotion as much as possible: if an > initial submission is good and addresses all technical review properly, > and if the cost to the core kernel is low, then barring alternative, > fully equivalent and superior patch submissions, rejecting it does more > harm than good.
Now that is an interesting challenge.
As I realize more and more we are all feeling beings.
Linus himself according to his own words as I received them wants to make perfectly sure that the developer who receives a message from him exactly knows how he feels, especially when he disagrees with a pull request and does not want to take it.
To my perception the whole kernel development process is quite full of emotion, including your message I reply to.
And now you want to get rid of it.
I bet you can.
If you remove Linus… and every other kernel developer from the development process, including yourself.
But then, who will develop the kernel?
I think a different way to handle emotions can help and I intend handle them this way to see what results I create this way. I am aiming to feel my feelings as they are, instead of immediately judging them or attaching a thought to them basically making them emotions and distorting them that way, blocking my energy in them [1].
So I will attempt to feel my feelings before I answer again. I didn´t do so in the last answer to you, and I think it shows.
[1] Arnold M. Patent, "You can have it all"
Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
| |