Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 02 Jun 2015 05:44:00 -0400 | From | Prarit Bhargava <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Documentation, intel_pstate: Add a better description of the intel_pstate legacy mode internal governors |
| |
On 06/02/2015 12:02 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 01-06-15, 09:36, Prarit Bhargava wrote: >> This patchset was originally submitted and acked here >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140203008832333&w=2 >> >> but lost at some point. >> >> P. >> >> ----8<---- > > I don't think this is the right place to have this information, you > should have added it after the three dashes below. (---).
AFAIK "scissors" works for comments not to be included in the commit.
> >> The current documentation is incomplete wrt the intel_pstate legacy >> internal governors. The confusion comes from the general cpufreq >> governors which also use the names performance and powersave. This patch >> better differentiates between the two sets of governors and gives an >> explanation of how the internal P-state governors behave differently from >> one another. >> >> Also fix two minor typos. >> >> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> >> Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com> >> Cc: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> >> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> >> Cc: x86@kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> > > You could have carried my Ack :)
:) I was uncomfortable carrying it TBH because I had changed the patch.
P.
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> >
| |