| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 4.0 064/105] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer | Date | Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:35:54 -0700 |
| |
4.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.
The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority, so correct it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_ if (producer_fifo >= 0) { struct sched_param param = { - .sched_priority = consumer_fifo + .sched_priority = producer_fifo }; sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m); } else
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|