lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] selftests: add seccomp suite
On 06/17/2015 12:12 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 10:54 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> This imports the existing seccomp test suite into the kernel's selftests
>>> tree. It contains extensive testing of seccomp features and corner cases.
>>> There remain additional tests to move into the kernel tree, but they have
>>> not yet been ported to all the architectures seccomp supports:
>>> https://github.com/redpig/seccomp/tree/master/tests
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>>> tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 +
>>> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/.gitignore | 1 +
>>> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile | 10 +
>>> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 2109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/test_harness.h | 537 ++++++
>>
>>
>> Thanks very much for adding this, it would have been very helpful recently when
>> I was trying to get seccomp filter working on powerpc :)
>>
>> I get one failure in TRACE_syscall.syscall_dropped:
>>
>> seccomp_bpf.c:1394:TRACE_syscall.syscall_dropped:Expected 1 (1) == syscall(207) (18446744073709551615)
>>
>>
>> So it looks like we're returning -1 instead of 1.
>>
>> That's probably a bug in our handling of the return value, or maybe an
>> inconsistency across the arches. I'll try and find time to dig into it.
>
> Ah-ha! Excellent. Did you add an implementation for change_syscall()
> in seccomp_bpf.c? I don't have a powerpc method in there. I would have
> expected both TRACE_syscall.syscall_redirected and .syscall_dropped to
> fail without that.
>
> If you did, maybe something isn't right with regs.SYSCALL_RET ? That's
> where the return value being tested on a skipped syscall is stored.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>

Thanks for the test. Fantastic to see so many positive responses
to this addition. Thanks Michael for testing it. It is now queued
for 4.2 in linux-kselftest next

thanks,
-- Shuah


--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-18 01:41    [W:0.080 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site