lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/12] x86/mm: Enable and use the arch_pgd_init_late() method

* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 06/13, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Afaics, we need to ensure that:
> > > >
> > > > > + if (pgd_val(*pgd_src))
> > > > > + WRITE_ONCE(*pgd_dst, *pgd_src);
> > > >
> > > > either we notice the recent update of this PGD, or (say) the subsequent
> > > > sync_global_pgds() can miss the child.
> > > >
> > > > How the write barrier can help?
> > >
> > > So the real thing this pairs with is the earlier:
> > >
> > > tsk->mm = mm;
> > >
> > > plus the linking of the new task in the task list.
> > >
> > > _that_ write must become visible to others before we do the (conditional) copy
> > > ourselves.
>
> Hmm. that write must be visible before we start to _read_ *pgd_src,
> afaics.
>
> > > Granted, it happens quite a bit earlier, and the task linking's use of locking
> > > is a natural barrier - but since this is lockless I didn't want to leave a
> > > silent assumption in.
>
> I agree,
>
> > Ah, there's another detail I forgot. This might handle the fork case, but in
> > exec() we have:
> >
> > tsk->mm = mm;
> > arch_pgd_init_late(mm);
>
> Yes, this too.
>
> But wmb() can't help. At least we need the full mb() to serialize the
> STORE above (or list addition in copy_process) with the LOAD which
> reads *pgd_src.

True.

> Plus we need another mb() in sync_global_pgds(), say, before the main
> for_each_process() loop.

True.

So since we have a spin_lock() there already, I tried to find the right primitive
to turn it into a full memory barrier but gave up. Is there a simple primitive for
that?

Also, since this is x86 specific code we could rely on the fact that
spinlock-acquire is a full memory barrier?

>
> it would be nice to make this more simple/clear somehow...

I'm afraid lockless is rarely simple, but I'm open to suggestions ...

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-14 10:41    [W:0.147 / U:0.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site