lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] numa,sched: only consider less busy nodes as numa balancing destination
From
Date
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 11:41 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 06 May 2015 13:35:30 +0300
> Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > we observe a tremendous regression between kernel version 3.16 and 3.17
> > (and up), and I've bisected it to this commit:
> >
> > a43455a sched/numa: Ensure task_numa_migrate() checks the preferred node
>
> Artem, Jirka, does this patch fix (or at least improve) the issues you
> have been seeing? Does it introduce any new regressions?
>
> Peter, Mel, I think it may be time to stop waiting for the impedance
> mismatch between the load balancer and NUMA balancing to be resolved,
> and try to just avoid the issue in the NUMA balancing code...

I'll give it a try as soon as I can and report back, thanks!



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-07 15:41    [W:0.140 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site