Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 06 May 2015 09:15:56 +0200 | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] Coccinelle: Check for return not matching function signature |
| |
> +virtual context > +virtual org > +virtual report
Where do you want to reuse these variables in your SmPL scripts?
> +@match@ > +identifier f,ret; > +position p; > +type T1,T2; > +@@ > + > +T1 f(...) { > + T2 ret;
Will it be more helpful to mark only such variable declarations where the specified data type should be reconsidered by a minus character or an asterisk (instead of the following return statement)?
> +<+... > +* return@p ret > +; > +...+> > +}
Regards, Markus
| |