lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: Preserve the user r/w register tpidr_el0 on context switch and fork in compat mode
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:19:24PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 05.05.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Will Deacon:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:09:57PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
> >> Am 05.05.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Will Deacon:
> >>> On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 05:24:18PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
> >>> Curious, but why do you need this? iirc, we added this for arch/arm/ because
> >>> of some windows rt (?) emulation in wine. Is that still the case here and is
> >>> anybody actually using that?
> >>
> >> Yes, Windows ARM binaries are the well known use case, but also the compat
> >> mode should do what the arm kernel is doing I’d think and the code wasn't
> >> adjusted yet.
> >
> > Sure, I was just curious.
>
> OK :)
> So what about the patch?

I'll need to take a proper look (it's on the list).

> >> What i'm curious about is why the main TLS register on arm64 is the user
> >> writeable, I'm not an security expert but this looks odd. I could easily
> >> provoke a crash by writing to it...
> >
> > You've probably got the wrong TLS. Allowing a program to clobber it's own
> > thread-local storage is no worse than allowing it to write to its general
> > purpose registers, pc, etc.
> >
> > I'm assuming the crash you saw was just a userspace crash, rather than
> > the kernel?
> >
>
> True, but the system became horribly instable, files were overwritten by
> others, very strange. It was in a remote KVM VM on bare metal aarch64...
> I don't dare to try it again because it causes others some trouble, but if
> someone wants to try it out: https://github.com/AndreRH/tpidrurw-test

Seems fine to me running both as 32-bit and 64-bit binary under an arm64
4.1-rc2 kernel.

The former just has test failures (because we don't context switch the
TLS):

[...]
ERROR: TPIDRURW is 00000000, expected cafebabe
[...]

whilst the latter SEGVs:

tpidrurw-test[1691]: unhandled level 1 translation fault (11) at
0xdeadbac2, esr 0x92000005
pgd = ffffffc079079000
[deadbac2] *pgd=0000000000000000, *pud=0000000000000000
[...]

Will


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-05 20:01    [W:0.032 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site