Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: Relax a restriction in sched_rt_can_attach() | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Mon, 04 May 2015 07:10:47 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 12:39 +0800, Zefan Li wrote:
> >> We are moving toward unified hierarchy where all the cgroup controllers > >> are bound together, so it would make cgroups easier to use if we have less > >> restrictions on attaching tasks between cgroups. > > > > Forcing group scheduling overhead on users if they want cpuset or memory > > cgroup functionality would be far from wonderful. Am I interpreting the > > implications of this unification/binding properly? > > > > (I hope not, surely the plan is not to utterly _destroy_ cgroup utility) > > > > Some degree of flexibility is provided so that you may disable some controllers > in a subtree. For example: > > root ---> child1 > (cpuset,memory,cpu) (cpuset,memory) > \ > \-> child2 > (cpu)
Whew, that's a relief. Thanks.
-Mike
| |