lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND] sched: prefer an idle cpu vs an idle sibling for BALANCE_WAKE
From
Date
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 12:21 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> In fact, select_idle_sibling() is already too expensive on current
> server hardware (far too damn many cpus in a LLC domain).

Yup. I've played with rate limiting motion per task because of that.
Packages have gotten way too damn big.

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-28 14:21    [W:0.265 / U:0.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site