Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 May 2015 13:20:02 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] latched RB-trees and __module_address() |
| |
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:37:17AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > That's rcu_read_lock_sched_held, not rcu_held_lock_sched_held(). > > Also, your unlikely is weird and backwards. > > I changed it as below, and folded. It's in modules-next. > > I'm now going to do some *actual* testing, and I'll go all Torvalds on > you if this spews warnings...
Fair enough, I did see the build robot fail on this. How come those only showed up now? This patch has been in your git tree for a long time; you picked up the rcu validation patches before the other ones.
| |