lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver
Fu Wei wrote:

>> Because there's no market for it. I'm not talking about what's
>> theoretically possible. I'm only talking about what makes sense and what
>> will actually happen. And I'm quite certain that we will never see an
>> actual 32-bit ARM SOC with an SBSA watchdog device in it.
>
> Why are you quite certain? any info you can kindly share here?

I used to work for a company called Calxeda that tried to sell a 32-bit
ARM Server SOC. Calxeda went out of business because no one would buy
it, and that was two years ago.

>> So can we PLEASE stop talking about 32-bit ARM support?
>
> why? we are just trying to figure out:
> Do we need to add ARM in "depends on" for SBSA watchdog driver?
>
> If some one suggests this, we need to figure out.

We do not need to add "depends on ARM" in the Kconfig for the SBSA
watchdog driver.

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-23 21:41    [W:0.092 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site