lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv5 07/28] thp, mlock: do not allow huge pages in mlocked area
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:37:25PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 03:41 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 02:56:42PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>On 04/23/2015 11:03 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >>>With new refcounting THP can belong to several VMAs. This makes tricky
> >>>to track THP pages, when they partially mlocked. It can lead to leaking
> >>>mlocked pages to non-VM_LOCKED vmas and other problems.
> >>>With this patch we will split all pages on mlock and avoid
> >>>fault-in/collapse new THP in VM_LOCKED vmas.
> >>>
> >>>I've tried alternative approach: do not mark THP pages mlocked and keep
> >>>them on normal LRUs. This way vmscan could try to split huge pages on
> >>>memory pressure and free up subpages which doesn't belong to VM_LOCKED
> >>>vmas. But this is user-visible change: we screw up Mlocked accouting
> >>>reported in meminfo, so I had to leave this approach aside.
> >>>
> >>>We can bring something better later, but this should be good enough for
> >>>now.
> >>
> >>I can imagine people won't be happy about losing benefits of THP's when they
> >>mlock().
> >>How difficult would it be to support mlocked THP pages without splitting
> >>until something actually tries to do a partial (un)mapping, and only then do
> >>the split? That will support the most common case, no?
> >
> >Yes, it will.
> >
> >But what will we do if we fail to split huge page on munmap()? Fail
> >munmap() with -EBUSY?
>
> We could just unmlock the whole THP page and if we could make the deferred
> split done ASAP, and not waiting for memory pressure, the window with
> NR_MLOCK being undercounted would be minimized. Since the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK is
> tracked independently from NR_MLOCK, there should be no danger wrt breaching
> the limit due to undercounting here?

I'm not sure what "ASAP" should mean here and how to implement it.

I would really prefer to address mlock separately. The patchset is already
huge enough. :-/

--
Kirill A. Shutemov


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-20 14:41    [W:0.083 / U:5.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site