lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Should we automatically generate a module signing key at all?
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure why you're bringing this up at such a late date. There
> was a kernel summit discussion led by Rusty on kernel module
> verification. The result of that discussion was to append the signature
> to the kernel modules. At the same time, Kees Cook was told to define
> an LSM kernel module hook. IMA is on that hook and can be used to
> verify kernel modules integrity based on either fiel hashes or
> signatures. The choice is yours.

I didn't notice that discussion. If I had, I would have suggested this at KS.


--Andy


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-19 20:01    [W:0.117 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site