Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 May 2015 11:59:38 +0200 | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 09/16] clockevents/drivers: Add STM32 Timer driver |
| |
On 05/19/2015 11:44 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > 2015-05-19 11:06 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>: >> On 05/19/2015 10:55 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >>> >>> 2015-05-19 10:16 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>: >>>> >>>> On 05/18/2015 04:03 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2015-05-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 05/09/2015 09:53 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> STM32 MCUs feature 16 and 32 bits general purpose timers with >>>>>>> prescalers. >>>>>>> The drivers detects whether the time is 16 or 32 bits, and applies a >>>>>>> 1024 prescaler value if it is 16 bits. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >>>>>>> Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 8 ++ >>>>>>> drivers/clocksource/Makefile | 1 + >>>>>>> drivers/clocksource/timer-stm32.c | 184 >>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> 3 files changed, 193 insertions(+) >>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/clocksource/timer-stm32.c >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig >>>>>>> index bf9364c..2443520 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig >>>>>>> @@ -106,6 +106,14 @@ config CLKSRC_EFM32 >>>>>>> Support to use the timers of EFM32 SoCs as clock source >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> clock >>>>>>> event device. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +config CLKSRC_STM32 >>>>>>> + bool "Clocksource for STM32 SoCs" if !ARCH_STM32 >>>>>>> + depends on OF && ARM && (ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are the interactive bool and the 'COMPILE_TEST' necessary ? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The interactive bool is necessary if we want to be able to >>>>> select/deselect it in COMPILE_TEST configuration. >>>>> And personnaly, I think COMPILE_TEST use makes sense. >>>>> >>>>> Note that other timer drivers are doing the same thing today >>>>> (CLKSRC_EFM32, SH_TIMER_CMT, EM_TIMER_STI...). >>>>> >>>>> Do you have a specific concern regarding COMPILE_TEST? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Actually, we try to keep the timer selection non-interactive and let the >>>> platform's Kconfig to select the timer. >>> >>> >>> Ok. >>> >>>> >>>> I like when the code is consistent. The COMPILE_TEST was introduced and >>>> created a precedence. I would like to get rid of the interactive timer >>>> selection but I did not have time to go through this yet. >>> >>> >>> Indeed, consistency is important. >>> On my side, I don't have a strong opinion regarding the COMPILE_TEST >>> thing. >>> IMHO, it is more a subsystem's maintainer choice. >>> >>> So, if as a maintainer you don't use it and prefer not supporting it, >>> I'm fine to provide you a new version without COMPILE_TEST. >>> Doing that, the interactive selection will disappear too. >>> >>> I can provide you a new version this evenning. >> >> >> Ok, great. > > Is the below Kconfig entry fine for you? > > config CLKSRC_STM32 > def_bool y if ARCH_STM32 > select CLKSRC_MMIO
config CLKSRC_STM32 bool select CLKSRC_MMIO
and in the arch/arm/mach-stm32/Kconfig add select CLKSRC_STM32
> Best regards, > Maxime > > >> >> Thanks >> -- Daniel >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs >>>> >>>> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | >>>> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | >>>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog >>>> >> >> >> -- >> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs >> >> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | >> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | >> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog >>
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
| |