Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 May 2015 17:28:59 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe |
| |
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:13:55AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> In future, for yourself and anyone else who is following this thread > for 'fun', if a patch crosses multiple subsystems (which I try to keep > to a minimum) it's probably best to indicate that in the subject line.
> mfd: regulator: <blah>
> ... would definitely get Marks attention. And yes, I know 'regulator' > is mentioned in the subject line of the particular patch. :)
Yeah, sadly it's not visible in the thread view in mutt here since it's too late in the subject line. That is good advice, though - the standard thing is either like you describe or "mfd/regulator: ". [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |