lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Should we automatically generate a module signing key at all?
From
Date
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 17:04 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Should we automatically generate a module signing key at all since
> that has the possibility of accidentally overwriting a key that the
> builder has placed in the tree?

I prefer the other solution I suggested a few minutes ago — let
signing_key.{priv,x509} be autogenerated, and if the user wants to
provide their own then let them call it something else.

--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
[unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-18 18:41    [W:0.761 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site