lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Should we automatically generate a module signing key at all?
    From
    Date
    On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 17:04 +0100, David Howells wrote:
    > Should we automatically generate a module signing key at all since
    > that has the possibility of accidentally overwriting a key that the
    > builder has placed in the tree?

    I prefer the other solution I suggested a few minutes ago — let
    signing_key.{priv,x509} be autogenerated, and if the user wants to
    provide their own then let them call it something else.

    --
    David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
    David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
    [unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-05-18 18:41    [W:3.333 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site