Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 May 2015 16:47:39 +0200 | From | Johan Hovold <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe |
| |
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:19:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > If you're looking for me to review something you need to send it to me, > > > > and the chances of me looking at it are very much increased if there's a > > > > relevant subject line. I'm CCed (not even on the to list) on endless > > > > large threads and reposts of patch serieses about MFD drivers most of > > > > which are of very little relevance to me so they get ignored very > > > > easily. > > > > > Calm down dear, it's only a commercial. > > > > > I wasn't having a pop. Rather empathising with your situation and > > > facilitating a resend that you're likely to see. > > > > > I'm sure Johan will do the right thing. > > > > My point is that a simple resend has a reasonable chance of getting > > dropped on the floor. > > As I say, I'm sure Johan will do what's required for that not to > happen.
Seriously? *Me* do the right thing?
We have a regression in your subsystems (mfd/regulator) with a fix that's been sitting in both your mailboxes since March 25th.
And now that Mark finally responds to a mail after repeated reminders from both me and Lee, he still doesn't care enough to look up the original mail or at least make sure that a resend does not get lost again.
You two even work for the same organisation. Just pick up the phone or find a way to get a message across that mail filter instead of wasting everyone else's time.
I have resent the patch now. Please make sure it gets applied.
Johan
| |