Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 May 2015 10:40:46 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4210platform |
| |
On 14-05-15, 13:07, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 05/13/15 23:08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > Hi Bart, > > > On Friday, April 03, 2015 06:43:43 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 specific support > >> from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver > >> for this platform. > > > > Gentle Ping. Mike/Kukjin/Viresh could you please review/ack relevant > > patches (patches #1-3 are for clock subsystem, patches #4-5 for Exynos > > mach/dts and patch #6 is for cpufreq subsystem)?
Sorry I thought I already Acked an older version of this set and so didn't went for it again. Done now.
> Yes, I totally agreed with this patches for arch side changes and this > approach when Thomas posted. > > > Also what is your > > preferred way to upstream them (patches are not independent so it would > > be best to merge them through one tree, otherwise synchronization of > > git pulls between different subsystem trees will be needed)? > > > I can provide topic branch for arch side changes even it is small. I > think once Viresh and Mike make each topic branch based on -rc or the > smallest changes from each subsystem then I could handle this series or > Viresh or Mike need to handle this series with merging each topic > branches in subsystem. I'm fine either way. > > Viresh and Mike, how do you think about that?
For cpufreq subsystem changes, you can take them in your tree.
> > I'm still hoping that this patchset will make it into v4.2 as there are > > no known issues with it (except minor coding nit for patch #5)... > > > Sure, why not :-)
One thing that looked wrong to me is the email id of Thomas.. I believe he has already left Samsung and his id wouldn't exist anymore. Right ?
Then I wouldn't recommend something that doesn't exist to get merged now. Probably use another email id of his.
| |