Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | John Stultz <> | Subject | [PATCH 2/3] kselftests: timers: Ease alarmtimer-suspend unreasonable latency value | Date | Wed, 13 May 2015 15:13:04 -0700 |
| |
On the hardware I have, resume latency from an alarm is often 2-3 seconds (with a fair amount of variability due to the RTC's single second granularity). Having four seconds be the pass/fail bar is maybe a little too tight, so extend this to 5 seconds.
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/timers/alarmtimer-suspend.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/alarmtimer-suspend.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/alarmtimer-suspend.c index 99a1ad3..13586b6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/alarmtimer-suspend.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/alarmtimer-suspend.c @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline int ksft_exit_fail(void) #define NSEC_PER_SEC 1000000000ULL -#define UNREASONABLE_LAT (NSEC_PER_SEC * 4) /* hopefully we resume in 4secs */ +#define UNREASONABLE_LAT (NSEC_PER_SEC * 5) /* hopefully we resume in 5 secs */ #define SUSPEND_SECS 15 int alarmcount; -- 1.9.1
| |