Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 May 2015 03:44:24 +1000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] cgroups: implement the PIDs subsystem | From | Aleksa Sarai <> |
| |
>> Would you be okay with this? >> >> if (limit < 0 || limit >= PIDS_MAX) >> >> I'd prefer if we used PIDS_MAX as the maximum input value as well as >> being the internal representation of the maximum, rather than >> switching to something like INT_MAX. > > Yeah, that sounds okay to me but I forgot why we went for INT_MAX in > the first place. Do you remember why we tried INT_MAX at all? > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun
I think it's because we didn't want to expose PIDS_MAX to userspace. But we're not *really* exposing it, we're just enforcing the input limit for "max".
-- Aleksa Sarai (cyphar) www.cyphar.com
| |