lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 0/6] selftests: Add futex functional tests
On 05/13/2015 05:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 5/13/15, 4:22 PM, "Shuah Khan" <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05/12/2015 10:07 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>> Hi Shuah,
>>>
>>> This series begins the process of migrating my futextest tests into
>>> kselftest.
>>> I've started with only the functional tests, as the performance and
>>> stress may
>>> not be appropriate for kselftest as they stand.
>>>
>>> I cleaned up various complaints from checkpatch, but I ignored others
>>> that would
>>> require significant rework of the testcases, such as not using volatile
>>> and not
>>> creating new typedefs.
>>>
>>
>> Daren,
>>
>> This patch series is good. kselftest run and install
>> are good. I see the following results. Something you
>> would expect??
>
> Yes, that is all expected behavior if you don't run as root and your user
> doesn't have the necessary capabilities added - similar to other tests
> with privileged operations.
>
>> No Issues and I am going to get them
>> into 4.2 - should show up in linux-kselftest next.
>
> Great, thanks. Perhaps some explicit capabilities tests and clearer error
> messages would make sense as a follow-on patch.
>
> Thanks for working with me to get these into the kernel, I think it will
> improve futex test exposure and hopefully encourage people to write more
> tests to fill some of the gaps.
>

Applied to linux-kselftest next for 4.2

thanks,
-- Shuah


--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-14 03:01    [W:0.039 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site