lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 0/3] pinctrl: Support for IMG Pistachio
From
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Bresticker
<abrestic@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:16:53PM -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>
>>> This series adds support for the system pin and GPIO controller on the IMG
>>> Pistachio SoC. Pistachio's system pin controller manages 99 pins, 90 of
>>> which are MFIOs which can be muxed between multiple functions or used
>>> as GPIOs. The GPIO control for the 90 MFIOs is broken up into banks
>>> of 16. Pistachio also has a second pin controller, the RPU pin controller,
>>> which will be supported by a future patchset through an extension to this
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> Test on an IMG Pistachio BuB. Based on mips-for-linux-next which inluces my
>>> series adding Pistachio platform support [1]. A branch with this series is
>>> available at [2].
>>
>> Does this mean you want me to funnel this through the MIPS tree? If so,
>> could I have an Ack from the maintainers?
>
> Linus mentioned in v1 that if the only dependency was a Kconfig symbol
> that he could take it through his tree. I'm fine either way, though
> it would be slightly more convenient for it to go through the MIPS
> tree. Linus?

I took 1/3 into pinctrl since it touched my core documentation and
actually even had to be slightly rebased.

I will look at 2/3 and 3/3 and provide ACK if I think they are
all right.

Yours,
Linus Walleij


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-07 16:01    [W:0.167 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site