Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Apr 2015 23:22:27 -0400 | From | Theodore Ts'o <> | Subject | Re: about the flood of trivial patches and the Code of Conduct (was: Re: [PATCH 19/25] sched: Use bool function return values of true/false not 1/0) |
| |
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 01:32:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I propose to send all this stuff though the trivial tree such that maintainers > > of other subsystems have less workload and newbies (which are supposed > > to send such patches) know which tree they have to work against. > > Let's have to well defined and ordered. :-) > > As per the other branch of this tree; an emphatic NO to that. The > trivial tree is not a backdoor to bypass maintainers. Actual code > changes do not get to go through any tree but the maintainer tree unless > explicitly ACKed.
Agreed, I don't want trivial patches to ext4 either (a) polluting my inbox, or (b) sneaking in behind my back in the trivial tree.
Joe, please just stop the madness.
Thanks,
- Ted
| |