lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10 2/3] watchdog: add watchdog_cpumask sysctl to assist nohz
On 04/30/2015 04:00 PM, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:39:25PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> if (err)
>> pr_err("Failed to create watchdog threads, disabled\n");
>> + else {
>> + if (smpboot_update_cpumask_percpu_thread(
>> + &watchdog_threads, &watchdog_cpumask))
>> + pr_err("Failed to set cpumask for watchdog threads\n");
> Stupid nitpick, this error message tells us the 'watchdog' threads caused
> the cpumask failure, but ....
>
>> + /*
>> + * Failure would be due to being unable to allocate
>> + * a temporary cpumask, so we are likely not in a
>> + * position to do much else to make things better.
>> + */
>> + if (smpboot_update_cpumask_percpu_thread(
>> + &watchdog_threads, &watchdog_cpumask) != 0)
>> + pr_err("cpumask update failed\n");
> This one does not. :-( If there is a respin, I would suggest copying the
> above message down here.

There is that "#define pr_fmt(fmt)" at the top of the file that prefixes
all the messages with "NMI watchdog: ", though. I think that's
sufficient to make it clear what the second message is about.
(The first message I wrote the way I did to be parallel with the
message just before it, if the thread creation failed.)

I could tweak the messages but I think they're reasonable given the
prefix. What do you think?

--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-30 22:41    [W:0.081 / U:1.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site