Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:50:18 +0100 | From | Will Deacon <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: ACPI: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA |
| |
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2015年04月29日 22:42, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:31:03AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > >> On 04/29/2015 09:04 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:44:08AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > >>> Any plans for ACPI on 32-bit ARM? > >> > >> Not that I am aware, but I could be totally wrong. The reason I am adding > >> this here for 32-bit ARM is because the ACPI spec mentioned this. > >> > >> If you think this is not necessary until we introduce ACPI for ARM32, it can > >> be removed. > > > > I think it should be removed (as long as ACPI cannot be selected on > > arm32). > > I agree. > > Now there is no plan for ARM32 ACPI as I know, ACPI for ARM targets > for ARM64 based enterprise system at now.
While we're at it, do we *really* need to support CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER on arm64? It's a deprecated /proc/acpi interface and it would be nice to avoid introducing deprecated behaviour if we can avoid it.
Will
| |