lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Module stacking next steps
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, John Johansen wrote:

> On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
> >> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
> >> procedure would you like to follow?
> >
> > What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as
> > useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in?
> >
> > Any objections or concerns?
> >
> No objections, and I know there are several people interested in seeing
> this land.
>
> I am happy with the code, and my only concerns lie with things that this
> explicitly doesn't support yet (ie. larger lsm stacking, secids, ...)

Ok, Casey, please send an updated final version for everyone to check.


--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-30 13:41    [W:0.077 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site