Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:20:16 +1000 (AEST) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: Module stacking next steps |
| |
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, John Johansen wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > > >> > >> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through > >> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What > >> procedure would you like to follow? > > > > What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as > > useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in? > > > > Any objections or concerns? > > > No objections, and I know there are several people interested in seeing > this land. > > I am happy with the code, and my only concerns lie with things that this > explicitly doesn't support yet (ie. larger lsm stacking, secids, ...)
Ok, Casey, please send an updated final version for everyone to check.
-- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
| |