lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 07/11] ARM: allow MULTIPLATFORM with !MMU
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 09:44:48PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> In order to support SoC with heterogenous CPU architectures (such
> as Freescale Vybrid/i.MXSX) it is preferable to use the same
> architecture (ARCH_MXC in this case) for the MMU enabled and !MMU
> CPU. Hence allow to select MULTIPLATFORM even without MMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 9f1f09a..636cb3f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ config VECTORS_BASE
> in size.
>
> config ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT
> - bool "Patch physical to virtual translations at runtime" if EMBEDDED
> + bool "Patch physical to virtual translations at runtime" if EMBEDDED || (ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM && MMU)
> default y

This makes no sense. Multiplatform MMU _requires_ this feature, so why
offer it to the user when multiplatform is enabled _and_ MMU is enabled?

Patch 7817/1 in the patch system tried doing something like you're trying
to do here - I wonder whether you've reviewed the mailing list for
previous discussions.

Given that it's Easter, I'm not going to re-state what I said last time
this came up, but instead leave you to do some research. For example,
reading message id <20130819232411.GX23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>...

Thanks.

--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-03 22:41    [W:0.085 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site