Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:44:30 -0700 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture |
| |
On 04/28/2015 09:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 04/28/2015 10:25 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: >> At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:22:10 -0700, >> Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> I will re-introducing h8300. >>>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions >>> on how to build one ? >> >> h8300-unknown-linux in gcc / binutils development version. >> Patch of a release version has not been prepared yet. >> > > Hi, > > With a toolchain based on binutils 2.25 (patched), gcc 5.1 (unpatched), and newlib 1.20 > (unpatched), I get for both h8300h-sim_defconfig and h8s-sim_defconfig: > > ./arch/h8300/kernel/vmlinux.lds:247: undefined symbol `jiffies_64' referenced in expression > > I had to modify arch/h8300/Makefile a bit since the linker does not understand > -mh8300helf_linux and -mh8300self_linux; I had to use -mh8300helf and -mh8300self > instead. Maybe I am missing a binutils patch. I also had to use h8300-linux-elf > as target to convince gcc to accept it as valid target. Both should not result > in the undefined symbol error, though. >
Also, a build after "make allyesconfig" shows a few missing functions. writel_relaxed readl_relaxed ioread32be iowrite32be
I should have mentioned that I used branch 'h8300' of git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git for the build tests.
Guenter
| |