Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:11:47 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] clk: dt: Introduce binding for always-on clock support |
| |
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > This useful binding should be accepted and people should not abuse > > it. If they do and the vendor Maintainer's review and accept then > > they have no foundation for recourse. > > > > Would you prefer it if I made the warning starker? > > Perhaps you can add a check for "clock-always-on" to scripts/checkpatch.pl, > to make people aware they should think twice?
That's a really nice idea!
Maxime, would that make you happ(y|ier)?
> Nah, people don't read documentation, don't run checkpatch, ignore compiler > warnings, etc...
:)
You can only wrap people in so much cotton wool. If they then decide to ignore all the warnings and jump, woe betide them.
-- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
| |